Redskins vs. Dollhouse

It can really suck to be a fan.  In fact, why are we fans?  What did the Washington Redskins ever do for me, particularly?  Yes, it was great fun to watch them, back in the day.  They won Superbowls.  Beat Dallas.  But the Redskins make a huge amount of money, as a team, and for each player.  Every year some team wins the Superbowl, why can’t I just be a fan of whatever team that might be?

I guess being a fan is the price of celebrating a victory as my own, and the price includes failure.  Without the possibility of losing, being a fan would mean no more than enjoying a movie, or some other form of entertainment.  So, because I invested myself and was rewarded during the Joe Gibbs era, I’m paying now.  But the Redskins are being destroyed by the man who makes all the money whenever fans engage.  So how can we still be loyal to anything?

Every season, since 1999, watching the Redskins has been an annual deathwatch.  How many games will it take to pull the plug this year?  Once the season is dead, we can turn our attention to other things.  The worst seasons are the ones with promise.  The ones where the latest crop of overpaid free agents make a little impact early on, before the long-term failure to build solid lines or any depth takes its toll.  But critiquing the Redskins is easy.  The real question is, why do I hang on?

I’m also a “fan” of Dollhouse.  Not like I’m a fan of House or Battlestar Galactica, which are fantastic shows that anyone would love if they were properly exposed.  No, my Dollhouse fanhood is like that I have for the Redskins.  Built on irrational hope and the occasional great performance.  But, where the Redskins have Vinny Cerato, Dollhouse has Eliza Dushku.  Sometimes they do episodes that do not feature her.  Those are often very good.  Still, I’ve oftened hoped the show would get bad enough that I could safely ignore it.  I thought it had, after a slow start to the second season.

But after I had sworn I was done, after I completely skipped an episode, I get the word that it had finally turned good.  I went to Hulu, cued it up, and watched the latest offering (Belonging).  Really, really good.  The show featured one of the more intriguing “Dolls,” her origin story, and a serious evolution of the character of the previously un-interesting Topher.  So now I have to watch the next episode.  Probably the one after that.  I don’t actually think it’s going to be good, Echo is still, nominally the center of the show.  But I’m a fan.  So I’ll sit through the deathwatch.

Vaccines, Bad Parenting, and Risk

I’m going to start lightly, but I end up talking about kids playing Russian roulette.

Me and High Blood Pressure

I don’t manage risk well.  If you give me a bunch of facts and stats and ask me to change my behavior, good luck.  For the past couple years of been treating my high blood pressure by inconsistent attempts at diet, sleeping better, and getting some exercise.  Anything but medication.  It’s a bad decision, and I know it pretty well because my job is health information outreach.  I’ve optimized articles on hypertension for the Web.

What did it take to get me back on medication?  I think my cardiologist actually threatened me.  Also, he woudn’t sign off on something else I needed, (ADD medication).  My sister had a similar experience.  She’s taking her high blood pressure meds because, as she says “I think the doctor said he was actually going to give me a stroke if I didn’t.”

Arguably, since I am only managing my own risk, I’m morally superior to the parents who won’t get their kids vaccinated.  But the moral element isn’t what I’m after today, it’s the thought process and how it might be changed.  My daytime job is basically health outreach.  Getting good information about health into the hands of people that need it.  Often I think we’re too timid.  We don’t want to offend anyone.  This keeps us from telling stories in a way that works.

Kids Dying in Swimming Pools

But first, let’s back up.  Swimming pools kill people.  So do guns.  If you let your kids play at a house a swimming pool you increase their risk.  If you let your kids play at a house where there are guns, you  also increase risk for your child.  Stasticaly, the swimming pool is FAR more dangerous.  But we feel more outraged by the guns.  Why?  We’ve accepted drownings as part of life.  Unfortunate accidents.  We think of them as something that happens passively.  An accidental shooting is active.  Someone DID something.  There is more guilt, some of which will always splash back on the parents.

Just imagine two headlines, without any other facts:

Child Dies in Swimming Pool (add sub-head about tragic unfortunate accident)

Child Killed While Playing With Gun (add sub-head about “could have been prevented” or “poor supervision” maybe “charges pending”)

Both could actually be prevented with about the same level of safeguards and attention, but one we process as passive and one as active.

Now to the vaccines.  Injecting a child with something is active.  Infectious diseases are, like swimming pools, a passive threat.  They are an unfortunate reality.  Tragic, but it happens.  Dying from a vaccination is an active event.  No matter how “correct” the decision may have seemed, that death will feel like the fault of the parent.

But passive and active are constructive, like foreground and background.  It all depends on how the story is told.  Instead of timid recitations of facts, here is how I would do a campaign to encourage parents to vaccinate their children:

Parents Letting Kids Die

Two kids, sitting across the table from each other.  Between them, a gun.  Yes, they are playing Russian Roulette, and Yes, we do show them taking turns and putting the gun to their head, while the parents watch.  Finally, the gun goes off and the kid collapses with the symptoms of swine flu.

Final message? “Take the gun away, get your children vaccinated.”  See? We’ve now converted swine flu into an active risk, and responsibility splashes back on the parents.

If anyone steals this idea, I hope they put it to good use.

Three Seasons of Lost in One Month

Somehow, perhaps because my Netflix-enabled xBox360 is now practically a video store in my living room, I ended up watching an episode of Lost.  My previous attitude towards Lost was a mixture of contempt and outrage that people where so devoted to it.  Some people compared it to BSG.  I kept comparing it to Gilligan’s Island.

But then, because I was in max ADD mode and needed something on in the background while I got some work done, I watched the first episode of Season one.  Then I watched the second episode, and the third.  Before the day was out, I was four episodes in.  As of now, I’ve finished Season 3, and fully intend to finish Season 4 before the last and final season starts live.  I love the show the same way I love peanut M & Ms.  They aren’t really nutritious, and it’s not exactly high-quality chocolate, but the combination can be perfect in the moment.

Broadly, though, my opinion hasn’t changed that much.  I still think:

  • The sci-fi in Lost sucks.  There’s no consistent underlying set of rules, just a sort of random interplay between odd tech and pure fantasy
  • The constant themes of fate and religion have been done better elsewhere.  The excess string of coincidence is constantly interpreted as having “meaning”.  But the meaning is always obscure.  “We were meant to be here.”  Sure, you were meant to be standing over there, and you, yes you, were meant to be naked.  (Kate, for instance, is constantly struggling with her clothes)
  • It’s no BSG.  But then, it really isn’t trying to be BSG.  One is a tightly woven story with gritty, real science fiction elements, the other is a bag of M & Ms.  Peanut.  It doesn’t make the M & Ms less tasty

What drives Lost is character.  The island is obviously the screen-writer’s vision of purgatory, whatever else they call it.  And purgatory is, by definition, filled with tortured souls who are on the edge between redemption and damnation.  Throw a bunch of these characters together, add some solid chemistry, and you get great drama.  Almost every character who gets introduced eventually becomes fascinating.  I love Bernie and Rose as much as I do Sawyer.  Of course Jack is just insufferable, but you always almost like him.

Writing a new story: the run-off election

I think people (by which I mean the press) underestimate the importance of writing a new story in Afghanistan.  Instead of business as usual, Karzai is acknowledging voter fraud and entering a run-off election.  Obama gets a lot of the credit for this.  While this may not seem like a big deal here, America’s reputation in the Middle East has two large stains.  The first, as everyone knows, is our uncritical support for Isreal.  This perception will probably persist even if we do pressure significant concessions out of Isreal, it’s ingrained in the Palestinian story.  But the other stain is that America supports repressive Arab and middle-eastern regimes, prizing stability and oil over the rights of the local people.  By pressuring Karzai, who we clearly want to stay in charge, into participating in the full democratic process, we are signalling that things really are different.  And, we stand favorably against the story of Iran.